If you’ve ever cracked open the California Probate Code and thought, “There has to be a translator for this,” you’re not alone. Between dense statutory language, cross-references that send you in circles, and provisions that seem written for a different era, even seasoned practitioners can find themselves doing a double-take.

That’s exactly why this new

A question for you: do you have an estate plan?  Of course you do, everyone needs an estate plan.

Second question: who is(are) the beneficiary(ies) of your estate plan? Someone you love and trust, I presume. Perhaps a spouse, or your children, or maybe even a worthy charity.

Follow-up questions: if your beneficiary is not

Hey everybody – it’s January! How was your New Year’s Eve? How did you celebrate? Did you go to a party? Did you host a party? Were there games at your party? What kind of games? Charades? Jenga?  Maybe you went crazy and played Twister!

What did I do at my New Year’s Eve party? 

Under universally accepted law, across every jurisdiction, lawyers owe vital and concrete duties to their clients.  The duty of confidentiality.  The duty of loyalty.  The duty to disclose.  And, greatest of all, the duty to inform your clients when their ideas are dumb.

Why is this last duty the greatest?  Probably because it’s the most

The California Courts of Appeal are typically pretty stingy with their published opinions – only about 10% of Court of Appeal decisions are published in the Official Reports.  And per Rule 8.1105 of the California Rules of Court, appellate decisions are supposed to be published only if they meet one of a certain set

Newcomers to probate litigation are frequently surprised by how differently things work in probate court, as opposed to your more straightforward civil courts. (And how do those newcomers know how civil courts work?  Law & Order, I’m guessing.) For example, in civil litigation, a plaintiff will typically pursue claims for him or herself. It is very rare

Regular readers of this blog have already noted my particular enthusiasm for creativity in legal arguments. I am not a judge (Hi Judge Galvin!), but if I were, I would be sorely tempted to pattern my unique brand of judicating after gymnastics judges, who dutifully award points for artistry as well as execution.

And that’s